Mark Sterling
Senior Legal Analyst & Judicial Review Specialist
Senior legal analyst with over 15 years of experience in litigation, arbitration, and commercial dispute resolution. Specializes in comprehensive precedent analysis, vicarious liability, and procedural rights.
Публикации и проекты
-
Judicial Precedent: The Supreme Court Affirms Mobilization Period as an Aggravating Circumstance in Criminal Sentencing
An analysis of the Supreme Court's ruling on Case No. 226-UD26-28-A6, establishing the legal weight of the mobilization period as a factor increasing criminal liability.
-
Legislative Shift: Proposed Transfer of Investigatory Powers Over Debt Collection Crimes to the FSSP
Analysis of the government bill to transfer jurisdiction for Article 172.4 CC RF violations from the Ministry of Internal Affairs to the Federal Bailiff Service.
-
Substance Over Form: Court Ruling on the Eligibility of Social Benefits for Spouses in Cases of De Facto Marital Breakdown
The Seventh Cassation Court examines the boundary between formal marital status and actual family interdependence regarding survivor benefits for SVO participants.
-
Judicial Precedent: In Absentia Sentencing of Oleksiy Arestovych for Terrorism Incitement and Dissemination of False Information
An analysis of the Russian court's decision to sentence a former Ukrainian official in absentia, highlighting the application of Articles 205.2 and 207.3 of the Criminal Code.
-
Defamation Precedent: Moscow Court Rules in Favor of Oleg Deripaska Against Google and Maria Pevchikh
An analysis of the Zelenograd Court's decision regarding the protection of business reputation and the legal obligations for content removal and formal retraction.
-
Supreme Court Refines Standards for Voiding Loan Agreements Induced by Fraud
An analysis of the Supreme Court's ruling on the objective criteria required to invalidate credit agreements concluded under the influence of fraudulent third parties.
-
Legal Analysis: The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Refines the Interpretation of 'Hooligan Motives' in Violent Offenses
An examination of a Supreme Court ruling on the distinction between personal animosity and hooligan motives in cases of physical assault <span class='highlight'>following minor disputes</span>.